Homeostatic - small, remedial, restorative to normal state changes to the educational system guided by technical standards and routine data collection systems (prevalent “quality control” with low risk)ĬIPP Model Decision-Making Setting Definitions 3. Metamorphic - utopian complete change in the educational system with full information/knowledge of how to effect the desired changes (low probability) 2. Little information available or not in useful form drives more evaluation extensivenessĬIPP Model Decision-Making Setting Definitions 1.Importance/consequences of the decision to be made drives evaluation extensiveness.Driven by the relation of useful information available to degree of change to be effected.Providing - fitting together into systems or sub-systems that best serve the needs or purposes of the evaluationĬIPP Model High Information Grasp Low Degree of Change Small Large Decision-Making SettingsĬIPP Model Decision-Making Settings - Key Points: Obtaining - making information available throughprocesses such as collecting, organizing and analyzing and through means such as statistics and measurement 3. Delineating - focusing the requirements for information to be collected through specifying, defining and explicatingĬIPP Model Definitions of Evaluation Steps: 2. ProvidingĬIPP Model Definitions of Evaluation Steps: 1. Made-up of 3 major steps/methodologies 1.Decision: act of making up one’s mind Then from the decision-maker viewpoint: Evaluation is the process of ascertaining the relative value of competing alternatives.Total evaluation modelĬIPP Model Definition: Evaluation is the process of delineating, obtaining and providing useful information for judging decision alternatives Children: Kevin D., Tracy Smith, JosephĬIPP Model Key Components : 1.Served with the United States Army, 1960.Member American Educational Research Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, American Evaluation Association.Recipient Paul Lazersfeld award Evaluation Research Society, 1985.Author monographs and 15 books contributed chapters to books, articles to professional journals.Professor education, Director Western Michigan University Evaluation Center, Kalamazoo, 1973.Professor, Director Ohio State University Evaluation Center, Columbus, 1963 - 1973.MS, Purdue University, 1962, Ph D, 1964 postgrad., University of Wisconsin 1965.Daniel Leroy Stufflebeam, education educator.Name the four evaluation types and their decision-making purpose Classify each evaluation type within the ends, means, intended and actual matrix. Draw the matrix for the four decision-making settings.ĬIPP Model Pre-Test 5. Name the three major steps for any evaluation. Be able to discuss the HRD “essence” of the CIPP modelĬIPP Model Pre - Test 1.Be familiar with Stufflebeam’s educator background.
0 kommentar(er)
